Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Leftists: “Take back America” is racist. Or something.

Notice something here:

But Obama, in his most candid moments, acknowledged that race was still a problem. In May 2010, he told guests at a private White House dinner that race was probably a key component in the rising opposition to his presidency from conservatives, especially right-wing activists in the anti-incumbent “Tea Party” movement that was then surging across the country. Many middle-class and working-class whites felt aggrieved and resentful that the federal government was helping other groups, including bankers, automakers, irresponsible people who had defaulted on their mortgages, and the poor, but wasn’t helping them nearly enough, he said. A guest suggested that when Tea Party activists said they wanted to “take back” their country, their real motivation was to stir up anger and anxiety at having a black president, and Obama didn’t dispute the idea. He agreed that there was a “subterranean agenda” in the anti-Obama movement—a racially biased one—that was unfortunate.

So if “take back America” is racist, then how’s about a convention of bigots on the left where Obama has spoken TWICE?


Hypocrisy and bigotry: crunchy and good with ketchup.


March 3, 2011 - Posted by | bigotry, hypocrisy, moonbats, Obama, Tea Party


  1. It is bewildering how they are able to “track” such statistics about workers being fired or punished every 23 minutes for supporting unions.
    Here’s a fact check I’d pay MONEY to see:
    How many of those who were “punished” for supporting unions happened to be people who were exposed for skipping work with bogus ailments and trumped up reasons to support “sick outs” or other tactics (that means UNEXCUSED WORK ABSENCE for the liberals…I know, a completely foreign concept).
    If fraudulently representing one’s absence from work while they attempt to be paid for said absence is exposed, it IS punished, since it is a form of employee THEFT…
    What about those who intentionally reduce productivity at their jobs as a form of “supporting unions”? I doubt liberals are aware that employers hire workers to PRODUCE something or provide a SERVICE. They don’t exist just to pay the most they can for the least amount of work (again, I know that confuses liberals…I can hear the stunned silence as they try to process such a thought). If one’s productivity falls, they can be punished, especially if it is determined to be intentional…that TOO is a form of theft in that they are depriving the employer of the marketable service or product yet they are retaining the same pay for the intentional loss.
    I wonder how many of those “every 23 minutes” happens to be people RIGHTLY punished or terminated????

    Comment by Kevin | March 3, 2011

  2. Love all the pre-printed signs the union bosses hand out to the lemmings. At least the Tea Partiers had original thoughts.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | March 7, 2011

  3. Like mindless zombies union workers blindy and obediantly follow their leaders without their minds and vote for the demacRATS in every election

    Comment by SPURWING PLOVER | April 12, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: