Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

MSM: You know, we might actually want to vet “greatest orator of modern time”

Newsbusters is all over this like Michael Moore on a pork chop platter:

HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: So is the press starting to sour on the stalemate in Libya?

Joining us now here in Washington, Roger Simon, chief political columnist for Politico; Dana Milbank, columnist for “The Washington Post,” and in San Francisco, Debra Saunders, a columnist for “The San Francisco Chronicle.”

Roger Simon, are the journalists and the anchors we just saw now aggressively challenging and acting openly skeptical about the Obama policy in Libya?

ROGER SIMON, CHIEF POLITICAL COLUMNIST, POLITICO: Yes, and that’s a good thing. We’re supposed to be openly skeptical.

The bloom isn’t entirely off the rose between Obama and the press (you don’t say? – CL), but reporters are starting to concentrate more than ever on what he says rather than how he says it. We will stipulate that he’s the greatest orator of modern times, but now we’re looking beyond that in every speech for what he’s actually telling us.”

Ho. Ly. Shiite.

To start with: “We will stipulate that he’s the greatest orator of modern times”?  Um…no, we won’t.

Better than “Tear down this wall?”  Better than “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country?”  Better than “A day that will live in infamy”?  Better than “I have a dream”?

Yeah, I guess all of those pale in comparison to “I’ve now been to 57 states”, “spread the wealth around”, “ten thousand people died” (he was close…it was 12 people), “uh, um, er“, and a bazillion other nuggets of genius.  With observations like “greatest orator of modern time”, we can be sure to expect hard-hitting, tough, bulldog-like journalism covering Oba-Mao over the next 18+ months!

“Greatest orator in modern time”? Really? Really?

Additionally: “We’re supposed to be openly skeptical”?  “Now we’re looking beyond that in every speech for what he’s actually telling us”?  Just now?

Well, I guess “better late than never” would apply.  Actually, no, it wouldn’t.

See, it’s too late for the MSM to actually “concentrate more than ever on what he says rather than how he says it”.  They did their leg-tingling best to get this socialist anti-American cretin elected, and now that he’s done his damage to this country?  Yeah, now the MSM is kicking around the idea of vetting him…four years after he announced his bid for the presidency.  H3ll, they spent more time in two months dumpster diving in Wasilla in 2008 for a candidate for second-in-command than they’ve ever spent reviewing the background of the Obamunist for first-in-command.

Nope…no liberal media bias!

April 5, 2011 - Posted by | media bias, Obama, shameful


  1. I’m at a loss for words, really, CL has said it all. I just agree with CL.
    Okay, I found some words for the MSM. Phonies, shills, frontmen, hucksters, b.s. artists, etc. Unbiased they are not. Reporting the news equally and fairly they cannot do.
    Blood pressure, gotta go.

    Comment by J.Guidry | April 5, 2011

  2. I, too, have nothing to add. CL usually says it all….I did chuckle with “Ho. Ly. Shiite.” Love that!

    Comment by George | April 5, 2011

  3. Barack Obama the all time worst president in american history and he is a liberal demacRAT to

    Comment by SPURWING PLOVER | April 6, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: