Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I dunno, warming?

Anti-capitalists, science fiction fans hardest hit:

Global greenhouse gas emissions have risen even faster during the past decade than predicted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other international agencies. According to alarmist groups, this proves global warming is much worse than previously feared. The increase in emissions “should shock even the most jaded negotiators” at international climate talks currently taking place in Bonn, Germany, the UK Guardian reports. But there’s only one problem with this storyline; global temperatures have not increased at all during the past decade.

The evidence is powerful, straightforward, and damning. NASA satellite instruments precisely measuring global temperatures show absolutely no warming during the past the past 10 years. This is the case for the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes, including the United States. This is the case for the Arctic, where the signs of human-caused global warming are supposed to be first and most powerfully felt. This is the case for global sea surface temperatures, which alarmists claim should be sucking up much of the predicted human-induced warming. This is the case for the planet as a whole.

If atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions are the sole or primary driver of global temperatures, then where is all the global warming? We’re talking 10 years of higher-than-expected increases in greenhouse gases, yet 10 years of absolutely no warming. That’s 10 years of nada, nunca, nein, zero, and zilch.

Exit question: When is Gore and the IPCC going to give back that Nobel Prize for science fiction?

Advertisements

June 13, 2011 - Posted by | global warming

7 Comments »

  1. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … […]

    Pingback by Industry begins to count the true cost of ‘climate change’ « News You May Have Missed | June 13, 2011

  2. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … […]

    Pingback by Industry begins to count the true cost of ‘climate change’ » Not Good News | June 13, 2011

  3. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … (crushliberalism.com) […]

    Pingback by Global Warming? « Pesky Emotional Republican | June 14, 2011

  4. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … (crushliberalism.com) […]

    Pingback by TEN MYTHS about Global Warming « Christians Wake-Up – Stop Being Passive and Comfortable | June 15, 2011

  5. Don’t try to confuse the left with facts!

    Comment by tnjack | June 15, 2011

  6. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … (crushliberalism.com) […]

    Pingback by Global Warming – CO2 only makes up 0.037% of the Atmosphere « Christians Wake-Up – Stop Being Passive and Comfortable | June 15, 2011

  7. […] In order for there to be global “warming”, shouldn’t there at least be some, oh I … […]

    Pingback by global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008 « World Energy Solutions | July 5, 2011


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: