Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Bombshell: More Climategate e-mails show scientists awfully concerned about “the cause” and P/R

Ace has a great rundown, and you would be well served to read it.  One of many, many damning excerpts from the e-mails:

<3373> Bradley: I’m sure you agree–the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should never have been published. I don’t want to be associated with that 2000 year “reconstruction”.

<3115> Mann:  By the way, when is Tom C going to formally publish his roughly 1500 year reconstruction??? It would help the cause to be able to refer to that reconstruction as confirming Mann and Jones, etc.

<3940> Mann:  They will (see below) allow us to provide some discussion of the synthetic example, referring to the J. Cimate paper (which should be finally accepted upon submission of the revised final draft), so that should help the cause a bit.

<0810> Mann: I gave up on Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she think’s she’s doing, but its not helping the cause.

As Ace puts it, “You know what you get when you mix science and politics? You get politics, period.”

Why, it’s almost as if scientists know they’re peddling junk science and don’t care as they pursue funding grants and environut adulation!  Almost, that is.

November 22, 2011 - Posted by | environuts, global warming, shameful


  1. This makes about as much sense as saying Algore works as tirelessly as he does to end global warm, I mean global coo, let me rephrase that, global climate change, just for the money…

    Comment by Im_bonafide | November 23, 2011

  2. No surprise here, keep moving along, nothing to see, just more of the same lying “scientists”. It’s my theory that when scientists engage in politics, they lose their standing as scientists. They lessen the value of their opinions just like politicians. Like politicians, they are in it for the money, irregardless of the truth.
    Liberalism is a mental disease.

    Comment by J. Guidry, Battlefield, MO. | November 24, 2011

  3. Not sure what “irregardless” means (ha), but I agree.

    Comment by Kevin | November 27, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: