Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Obama lets his communist leanings show loudly and clearly

One of the things I’ve detested about the left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) since BHO decided to run for president was their insistence that their boy was a “centrist” or “center-left” guy.  He was raised by an anti-American Muslim father (for a while) and an anti-American socialist mother, indoctrinated with anti-American propaganda at his madrassas and in college by Marxist professors, associated with the New Party (communist, Google it), bombarded with anti-American socialist vitriol in Jeremiah Wright’s church for over two decades, palling around with anti-American left-wing terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and best buds with his most frequent White House visitor Andy Stern (former SEIU chief).

Yet the left would have us believe that despite incubating in such an anti-American leftist cesspool, BHO was immune to all of the effects one would expect from someone with such a background.  If you lie with dogs, you get fleas…unless you’re Obama, in which case you’re immune from fleas.

Last week, Stern wrote a column telling Americans that our capitalist model was a failure and needed to be shaped to match the Chicom model.  Stern was one of many union bosses who have openly espoused communist…er, “pro-worker”…sentiments.  When you listen to their rhetoric, it sounds exactly like something you would have heard from Lenin, Chavez, Castro, et al.  It’s official: unions are nothing more than commie front groups.  Period.  The science is settled.

Oh, but I forgot: Just because ObaMao is best buds with Stern, Hoffa, et al, does NOT mean he shares their communist sensibilities.  To think otherwise is crazy.  I mean, aside from a rare moment of honesty with Joe the Plumber, when has BHO ever advocated anything other than a capitalist model?

Now.  The answer to the prior question is now.  In Kansas, no less.  Here’s what he had to say about capitalism:

“It’s a simple theory — one that speaks to our rugged individualism and healthy skepticism of too much government. It fits well on a bumper sticker. Here’s the problem: It doesn’t work,” Obama said of supply-side economics, drawing extended applause. “It’s never worked.”

Oh, sure, some would argue that he wasn’t talking about capitalism per se, but of supply-side economics.  Folks, that is a distinction without a difference.  As Ace rightly notes:

He says “trickle-down economics” rather than capitalism, but “trickle-down economics” is merely an argument in favor of capitalism. There is no such thing as “trickle-down economics.” There is capitalism, and the argued advantage of it, which is the trickling down of created wealth.

…But Europe is probably going to plunge into something in between a recession or a depression, and may erupt in violence and political disorder.

And Europe is Obama’s lodestar. That’s where he wants to take us. To the extent we haven’t gotten there yet, it’s because Americans are soft, lazy bitter clingers who hate other sorts of people (and their politico-economic systems).

So Europe’s 60 or 70 year history with socialism is about to end in violent upheavals and misery… and here’s this ignoramus saying that it’s capitalism which is the proven failure.

As an intemperate interjection, might I note that if, by “never worked”, the organizer-in-chief means “increased government revenues every time”, then yeah, “never worked.”  If, by “never worked”, he means the creation of 16 million new jobs, then he’s right…”never worked”.

But that’s not what he means.  Those aren’t benefits…not to the people he seeks to please.  No, by “never worked”, he means “it has never taken more money from the producers and funded the non-producers’ chosen lifestyles of lethargy and dependence in perpetuity.”  That’s what he means.  See, when 16 million new jobs were created, you had to be handicapped or lazy to not get a job, because they were everywhere.  Every time supply side economics has been tried, the economy has picked back up, jobs have been created, and revenues to the government have increased as a result of more people working and paying income taxes (and not on public dependence).  But to ObaMao, public dependence is a feature, NOT a bug!

The son of a motherless goat is a commie.  He’s had it pounded into his head since he was a fetus (that, luckily for him, escaped medical procedures that he endorses, to the point of infanticide).  No amount of results will shake his belief that it is communism, and not capitalism, that has failed every time.  He just knows it will be different this time…it’s got to be!  (Sidebar: I know that communism and socialism aren’t exactly the same thing. But the differences are not great, so as far as I’m concerned, for the sake of B.O.’s leftist leanings, they’re the same thing.)

For the sake of the republic, this #sshat must be removed from office in next year’s election.  This country cannot survive eight years of Obamunism.

Advertisements

December 8, 2011 - Posted by | big government, capitalism, economic ignorance, Obama, taxes, unions

7 Comments »

  1. The USofA has three enemies: Communists, Islamists and criminals. Guess who is in bed with all three groups.

    Comment by Dux | December 8, 2011

  2. Excellent post! Like you, I’m beyond exasperated that Dear Leader is such a Marxist. At least he’s out of the closet now, so to speak. Not that his sudden honesty is going to cost him politically. But we can try.

    Comment by FullMetalPatriot (@FullMtlPatriot) | December 8, 2011

  3. So, when will the Repbubs start using the speech to blast him out of the saddle? Still a bunch of cowards in Congress, huh? I knew he was at least a socialist back when he was running for the office of president. All one had to do was skim through his books, it was all in there. Sorta like Hitler did in Mein Kampf.
    What a bunch of idiots are those who voted for him in ’08. They would’ve known what was gonna happen once he was in office. Dumbasses.
    Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    Comment by J. Guidry, Battlefield, MO. | December 9, 2011

  4. They believe that the model CAN work…it just hasn’t worked YET because there weren’t the “right” people running it. Even though it is a demonstrated FAILURE…just let THEM do it and it will somehow work!!!! C’mon…just set aside out constitution and let them try it…IF it doesn’t work, I’m sure we can trust them to go back to the Democratic Republic we originated as….we can trust them, right????

    Comment by Kevin | December 12, 2011

  5. […] Obama lets his communist leanings show loudly and clearly « Crush Liberalism. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Anti-American, Anti-Patriotic, Communism, Obama, Socialism and tagged Communists, Obama by irbinskas. Bookmark the permalink. […]

    Pingback by Obama lets his communist leanings show loudly and clearly « Crush Liberalism | Irbys word | December 13, 2011

  6. JG is right.

    B. HUSSEIN Obama told Joe The Plumber during his campaign that He wanted to REDISTRIBUTE The Wealth! And the SOB certainly has!!!!!!!!

    Comment by tnjack | December 14, 2011

  7. […] Obama lets his communist leanings show loudly and clearly (crushliberalism.com) […]

    Pingback by Do You Eradicate a Disease, or Just Push It Back? « Grumpa Joe's Place | December 20, 2011


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: